Explain how a service focused approach to risk assessment would differ from a person centred approach A risk assessment can only identify the probability of harm, assess the impact of it on the individuals, and pose intervention strategies which may diminish the risk or reduce. Assessments cannot prevent risk. Risk is a normal and often beneficial part of everyday life, but while it enables learning and understanding, in the case of potentially destructive consequences it may need to be monitored and restricted. Traditional methods of risk assessment are full of charts and scoring systems, but the person, their objectives, dreams and life seem to get lost somewhere in the pages of tick boxes and statistics. A service focused approach seeks to avoid all risks as far as possible. Staff would be expected to behave and act in a synchronised way with regards risk, not taking into account the individuals wishes. It has no flexibility and is not a responsive approach to meet peoples changing circumstances. A service centred approach to risk assessment would be guided by a standard procedure and can compromise individuals rights to make choices and take risks. Often concerns about minimising and attempting to eliminate risks are in the interests essay of the organisation, but not necessarily in the interests of the person they are attempting to support.
Defensible decision making: there is an explicit and justifiable rationale for the risk management decisions Following the person centred approach generates a clear trail of written records of what has been discussed, the different perspectives, issues and solutions that have been considered, along with any. The paperwork generated during the process provides a clear rationale for why the decisions that emerge during the process have been taken, and why other options have been rejected. The rationale for decision making is also more clearly expounded and recorded than in traditional risk assessment forms in common usage. A learning Culture The positive and productive approach to risk has a deep emphasis within it on ongoing learning using learning and reflective tools like the learning log, the 41 questions and Whats Working/Whats not working, and by clearly defining for staff their core duties. If it is part of a serious and concerted attempt by services to change their philosophy and practice in a person centred direction, it can contribute significantly to building a learning culture within organisations. Tolerable risks a key aspect of the person Centred Approach is that it uses creative thinking techniques around methods to mitigate the risk and improve quality of life, moving from situations which make the person happy but unsafe, to where they and the community are. Experience of using the process is that it enables participants to take a more balanced and rational approach to risk, finding ways to enable the person to achieve what is important to them while considering what keeps that person and the community safe.
Essay on Unit 3: Enabling, learning and, assessment - 2203 Palabras Cram
Bates and Silberman argue here that quality of life should be maximised while traditional people and communities are kept as safe as can be reasonably expected within a free society Thinking around what it would take to keep the person and others safe while taking the. One section of the process includes a question What does essay the law say? Enabling the process to be informed by the current law, including legislation such as the human Rights Act. Proportionality: The management of the risk must match the gravity of potential harm Using the person centred thinking tools means flexibility. The more serious the issue, the more people and the more time can be spent considering it in greater detail. Unlike conventional risk assessment, the approach explores the consequences of not taking the risk, to the person, to their family, community and services, balancing these against the potential consequences of taking the risk.
Contextualising Behaviour: why did the person behave in this way? part of the process involves gathering together previous information about the person, including a history of the persons experience of the risk issue from their own perspective, as well as other historical data, gleaned from a variety of sources including learning logs which look. The 41 questions (What have we tried? What have we learned? What are we pleased about? What are we concerned about? ) help not only to gain an understanding of a persons behaviour in different contexts, but also to build a picture of what has been learned about what is the best support for that person.
Risk management is finding a balance between positive risk taking based on autonomy and independence and a policy of protection for the person and the community based on minimising harm. Bates and Silberman give a list of 7 criteria that any such approach would have to fulfil, these being: Involvement of Service Users and Relatives in Risk Assessment. Positive and Informed Risk taking. Explain how to apply the principles and methods of a person-centred approach to each of the different stages of the process of risk assessment Working in a personalised way and developing a positive person-centred approach means accepting there are risks that cannot be avoided but. Reasonable risk is about striking a balance in empowering people with support needs to make choices ensuring that the person has all the information, tailored to their specific needs, in the appropriate format, to make their best decisions Involvement of service users and relatives.
The process uses the relationship Circle to help the person and their allies identify key people who could form the persons circle of support. This group of people is involved from the outset, in the initial gathering of information, in the framing of what the risk under discussion actually is, in thinking that generates ideas and solutions, in evaluating these solutions, in decision making around the risk, in implementing. Staff must understand what service users and others want, how they view their own risks and what responsibilities each person has in managing risks effectively. The person Centred Approach meets this by asking for a clear picture of what the person wishes to achieve, why this is important to the person, what success would look like, a history of the risk and uses the doughnut tool and decision making agreement. Positive and informed risk taking: The process is built around a positive view of the person it seeks to learn what the persons gifts and skills are, what people like and admire about them, as well as investigating what would be necessary to keep them. The process is based on finding creative solutions rather than simply ruling things out.
Learning, and, development, Essay, sample
If the outcomes are part of the support hazlitt plan and all risks have been fully discussed and understood, this can lead to real choice and control and a better quality of life for the individual. With support for positive risk taking it can help the individual to: gain self-confidence-achievement, development, new skills and knowledge develop skills-goals setting, new activities, support take an active part in their community-involvement, participation, inclusion. Outcome 2, understand the importance of a positive, person-centred approach to risk assessment. Explain the process of developing a positive person-centred approach to risk assessment every opportunity contains risks a life without risk, is a life without opportunities, often without quality and without change. Traditional methods of risk assessment are full of charts and scoring systems, but the person, their objectives, dreams and life seem to get forgotten. A person centred approach focus on the individuals rights to have the lifestyle that they chose, including the right to make bad decisions. It is about helping people and those who care about them, think in a positive and productive way in order to achieve the changes they want while keeping the issue of risk in its place.
Personalised care is for everyone, but some people will need more support than others to make choices about how they live their lives. Everyone has the right to personalised care and as much choice and control as possible. As the pace on personalisation is picked up it is necessary to ensure that this includes the most vulnerable members of our society, including those who may lack capacity. With effective personalisation comes the need to manage risk for people to make decisions as safely as possible. Making risks clear and understood is crucial to empowering service users and carers, recognising people as experts in their own lives. Risk management does not mean trying to eliminate risk. It means managing risks to maximise peoples choice and control over their lives. True empowerment means that people might make decisions service providers disagree with.
created by social and cultural barriers. For some services, approaches to risk have in the past been concerned with avoiding potentially harmful situations to service users and staff. People may need to take risks to achieve their aspirations but people who need support can be discouraged from taking risks. This may be because of their perceived limitations or because of fear that they or others might be harmed, resulting in criticism or compensation claims. A more positive approach to risk is now being developed, recognising that in addition to potentially negative characteristics, risk taking can have positive benefits for individuals, enabling them to do things which most people take for granted. Risk can be beneficial, balancing necessary levels of protection with preserving reasonable levels of choice and control. A balance has to be achieved between the wishes of those who use services and the common law duty of Care. Describe the links between risk-taking and responsibility, empowerment and social inclusion.
Traditionally they are not encouraged to take risks in areas such as budgeting, planning, employment and daily living skills. This may be either because of their perceived limitations or fear that they or others might be harmed. Everyone has a right to take risks and make decisions about their lives. There is a balance to be found between service users participation in everyday activities and your duty of care. Changes in social care and health policy mean that all adults are being actively encouraged to increase their independence by, for example, travelling independently, and by being fully involved in mainstream society through education, work and leisure. It is impossible ever to fully eliminate risk. It is however possible to minimise and prepare for risk by preventative action. To support people to live independently or to travel independently or take part in everyday activities means accepting that there are risks that cannot be avoided but can essay be minimised and prepared for.
Math Methodology: Assessment, essay
Unit 4222-342, support positive risk taking for individuals (hsc 3066). Outcome 1, understand the importance of risk taking in everyday life : we will write a custom essay sample on 342 - support Positive risk taking For Individuals or any similar topic only for you. Explain ways in which risk is an integral part of everyday life. For many interests people risk is an accepted part of everyday life. Every day activities such as catching the bus, travelling on holiday, playing football, setting up home and starting a family all carry some element of risk. Risk plays a part in our health, safety, security, well-being, employment, education, daily activities, using resources and equipment and in community participation. But some adults, for example disabled people or older people, are often discouraged from taking risks.